If you want to check out a church, seek responses to these quotes:
a.
The Humanist Richard Kilty asks if
evolution and religion are reconcilable, complementary or both. He answers by
expressing that, “We are not dealing on this amorphous level, instead we want
to know about the antithesis of man in evolution and man in Christianity. And
we do have an anti-thesis: Acceptance of evolution precludes the fundamentals
of Christianity, to wit, Garden, Adam and Eve, Fall, Redeemer, Crucifixion,
Resurrection, and Ascension. Acceptance of evolution requires the
concatenation: fish-amphibians-reptiles-
b. Kilty goes on to conclude with acute insight that the two are not reconcilable, that a child taught evolutionary concepts (including long ages), will have his belief in God disturbed: “How subversive is evolutionary theory to Church dogma.”
c. Another atheist looks at the long ages supposedly expressed in the fossil record, and concludes, quite logically, that as this indicates death on a high order, a loving God cannot exist: “We astute rationalists have no qualms regards the predation of primeval organisms as having commenced as dire necessity well over one billion years ago or more under the most inhospitable of prevailing conditions...The fossil record bares no record of lenity throughout the bulk of an estimated 70 kilometres[sic] deep accumulation of sediments in the whole of the visible fossils geological sequence...benevolence has no place in the realms of reality or survival of the fittest.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.